Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Lawsuit by Flight Attendants Fired Over Religious Objections to Equality Act Support
A Ninth Circuit ruling allows two former Alaska Airlines employees to proceed with their religious discrimination claims against the airline and their union.
Media·

A federal appeals court has revived a lawsuit initiated by two former flight attendants against Alaska Airlines, asserting they were terminated due to their religious beliefs. The employees had voiced objections to the airline's endorsement of the Equality Act, leading to their dismissal.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling on Wednesday, determining there is adequate evidence for a jury to assess whether Lacey Smith and Marli Brown's dismissals were a direct result of their religious convictions. This decision allows their legal challenge against the airline to move forward.
Background of the Dispute
The controversy originated in early 2021 when Alaska Airlines announced its support for the proposed Equality Act on an internal online platform accessible to employees. The Equality Act, championed by then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, aimed to incorporate sexual orientation and gender identity as protected categories under federal civil rights legislation concerning employment, housing, and other areas. The bill successfully passed the House of Representatives in February 2021.
The airline invited employees to share their thoughts and comments on the online forum. During this discussion, Lacey Smith posted a question asking, "As a company, do you think it’s possible to regulate morality?" Concurrently, Marli Brown submitted a comment articulating her deeply held religious convictions, suggesting that the Equality Act could negatively impact women, girls, and individuals of faith.
Following these remarks on the company's internal forum, both Smith and Brown faced investigations and were subsequently fired from their positions. Alaska Airlines characterized their comments as "discriminatory," "hateful," and "offensive."
Legal Challenge Proceeds
Stephanie Taub, senior counsel at First Liberty Institute, which represents Smith and Brown and argued their case before the court in August 2025, expressed satisfaction with the appellate court's decision.
"We are grateful the court recognized the clear evidence of religious discrimination against Marli and Lacey by both Alaska Airlines and the flight attendants’ union," Taub stated. "The Ninth Circuit’s decision today reinforces that federal civil rights laws protect people of faith from discrimination by their employer or their union. You cannot be fired because your employer does not like your religious beliefs."
The ruling underscores the protection afforded to individuals of faith under federal civil rights statutes, ensuring that employment decisions are not based on an employer's disapproval of an employee's religious beliefs.
Related Stories

Donald Trump Remarks on Assassination Attempts: "Only Consequential Presidents Get Shot"
Former President Donald Trump made a striking comment about assassination attempts against him, noting that "only consequential presidents get shot." The remarks came during a conversation with his former lawyer,
Aug 24

Tom Homan Dismisses Racial Profiling Claims by Florida Democrat Against ICE as 'Ridiculous'
Former acting ICE director Tom Homan strongly refuted claims by Florida Democratic Senate nominee Angie Nixon that immigration agents racially profile Black Americans. Homan emphasized that enforcement is based on
Aug 23

Rainn Wilson: Texas Candidate James Talarico's Faith 'Achingly Close' to Jesus' Teachings
Actor Rainn Wilson recently stated that Texas U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico's Christian beliefs are remarkably aligned with Jesus's teachings. On his podcast, Wilson and Ezra Klein criticized conservative
Aug 23

Hasan Piker Sings Mocking 'We Are Charlie Kirk' Song at Live Event, Draws Strong Online Criticism
During a recent stop on his 'Fear& LIVE' tour, far-left streamer Hasan Piker performed a mocking version of the song 'We Are Charlie Kirk.' This public display quickly went viral, prompting sharp condemnation from
Aug 23